Adasima
Adasima
All Solutions

Pass FCA Authorisation — Before You Submit

Simulate the regulator. Eliminate contradictions. Enforce financial and policy integrity before your application is reviewed.

Detects regulatory contradictions across all documents
Simulates FCA case officer challenges — not generic checks
Enforces capital, safeguarding, and cost completeness rules

Three Enforcement Layers

How RAV Works

RAV is not a document management tool. It is a regulatory enforcement engine with three layers of validation that run before your application reaches the FCA.

01

Policy Hardening Engine

Deterministic control injection across every policy document. Enforces Single Source of Truth consistency, detects cross-document contradictions, and eliminates hallucinated or orphaned policy statements.

Deterministic control injection (no hallucination)
SSOT enforcement across all documents
Cross-document contradiction detection
Regulatory basis traceability per policy clause
100% policy validation achieved across 19 regulatory documents
02

Financial Enforcement Engine

Licence-aware financial validation that applies the correct FCA capital rules for your specific licence type. Enforces safeguarding requirements, validates cost completeness, and checks revenue-volume coherence.

Licence-aware capital calculation (SEMI, EMI, API, SPI)
Safeguarding requirement enforcement (EMR 2011 logic)
Cost completeness validation (no missing regulatory spend)
Revenue-volume coherence checks
Prevents financial models that would fail FCA scrutiny
03

FCA Case Officer Interview Simulator

Simulates real FCA case officer interrogation — including contradictions, evidence gaps, and financial inconsistencies. Generates the Information Requests your application will face before submission.

Generates Information Requests (IRs)
Detects SSOT conflicts across documents
Challenges capital and safeguarding logic
Flags evidence gaps and missing attestations
Produces quantified readiness score
Surfaces the exact challenges FCA case officers will raise

Regulatory Reality Check

What the FCA Will Challenge

These are real examples of the challenges RAV surfaces — the same contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies that FCA case officers will raise during assessment.

High Risk — SSOT Contradiction

Your safeguarding method is described inconsistently across your Safeguarding Policy, Business Plan, and Compliance Manual. Which is correct?

RAV detects and resolves this before submission
High Risk — Capital Logic

You have stated a fixed initial capital requirement for a Small EMI. Can you explain this given the EMR 2011 requirements that only Method D applies?

RAV detects and resolves this before submission
Medium Risk — Financial Coherence

Your projected transaction volume in the financial model differs from the figure cited in your Business Plan. Which figure should we rely on?

RAV detects and resolves this before submission
High Risk — Evidence Gap

Your AML/CTF Policy references customer due diligence procedures that do not appear in your Compliance Monitoring Programme. How are these monitored?

RAV detects and resolves this before submission

Financial Enforcement

Regulatory Financial Integrity

Not a financial model. A regulatory financial validation engine. Prevents applications being rejected due to financial incoherence.

Capital Calculation

Methods A, B, C, and D — applied correctly per licence type. SEMI gets Method D only. EMI gets A, B, and D. API gets A, B, C.

Safeguarding Enforcement

EMR 2011 safeguarding logic validated against your chosen method. Asset segregation, insurance, or guarantee — consistently enforced.

Cost Completeness Validation

Every required regulatory cost item checked against licence type — safeguarding, compliance monitoring, audit, reporting.

Break-Even Realism

Revenue projections validated against volume assumptions. Unit economics enforced — selling price, variable costs, margin per service stream.

What This Prevents

FCA delays of 6-12 months from financial queries
Re-submission costs of £50k-£150k+
Credibility damage with the regulator

Target Institutions

Built For

EMI / AEMI Applicants

Full-scope e-money institutions and agents preparing for FCA authorisation with complex safeguarding and capital requirements.

Payment Institutions Scaling to Authorisation

Registered Small PIs and APIs graduating to full authorisation, requiring comprehensive regulatory evidence packs.

Compliance Firms Preparing FCA Submissions

Consultancies assembling authorisation applications for clients who need institutional-grade enforcement and audit trails.

Legal Advisors Supporting Regulated Clients

Law firms advising on regulatory applications who need traceable, defensible evidence of every policy decision.

Engagement Model

Pre-FCA Survival Infrastructure

RAV is priced against the risk it eliminates — not as a monthly subscription. A single FCA rejection costs 6-12 months of delay and £50k-£150k+ in resubmission. RAV prevents that.

Entry

£2k - £5k

Per application

Policy hardening + financial validation

Full Simulation

£10k+

Per application

All engines + FCA case officer simulation + evidence pack

White-Label

Premium

For consultancies

RAV embedded in your advisory practice

Final Position

RAV simulates how the FCA will challenge your application — and fixes the issues before submission.

Contact Sales