Genesis Governance
Design governance that exists beyond the policy document.
Genesis Governance builds the board, committees, responsibilities, control functions and reporting that hold together as an operating reality — the governance the firm can actually run, and evidence.
The problem
Governance as operating reality, not paperwork.
A governance document is easy to write. Governance that the board can operate, resource and evidence is what the regulator actually tests.
The structure
Board, committees, roles and responsibilities.
Board composition
The right mix of executive and non-executive experience for the institution being built.
Committees
The committees the firm needs — risk, audit, others — with clear remit and cadence.
Responsibilities
Prescribed responsibilities and accountabilities allocated to named individuals.
MLRO and compliance roles
The MLRO, compliance and other control functions defined, resourced and reporting correctly.
Skills and capacity
Evidence that the people have the skills and the capacity for the roles they hold.
Outsourcing oversight
Oversight of outsourced and intra-group services, with accountability retained in the firm.
The operating model
How the governance actually runs.
Structure is only half of it. Genesis defines the lines of defence, decision rights, information and reporting that make the structure operate.
Three lines or proportionate alternatives
A three-lines-of-defence model, or a proportionate alternative appropriate to the size and nature of the firm — designed, not assumed.
Decision rights
Who decides what, and where authority sits — so decisions can be made and traced.
Management information
The information the board needs to govern, defined so that oversight is informed rather than nominal.
Board reporting
Regular, structured reporting that turns management information into board decisions and a record of them.
Evidence of governance
Genesis Governance produces governance that can be evidenced — the structure, the responsibilities and the reporting connect to the same institutional model that builds the rest of the application.
So when a case officer asks how the firm is governed, the answer is a consistent, traceable model — not a policy document that stands apart from how the institution actually runs.
- Responsibilities map to named individuals and their evidence.
- The governance framework agrees with the operating model and the financials.
- Board reporting and management information are defined, not implied.
- The design supports supervisory readiness after authorisation.
Design governance the firm can actually run.
Start a Genesis assessment, or see how Genesis builds an operating governance model in a live demonstration.